2 Patients with 3d degree burn over 97% survive!!?

books say when 3d degree burn more then 75% of body mortality rapidly approches 100% partially due to profound hypovolemic shock, partially due to sepsis, as the skin is a major organ of the immune system. Yet ever now and then hear of patient 3d degree burns over 98-99-100% and still survive, please see link below (http://www.yellowstone.net/newspaper/200... Why is is not possible to simply treat this hypovolemia with multiple crystalloid and plasma lines + add a dressing on the patient soaked with adrenaline (epi) to produce vasoconstrction to slow fluid loss, and prevent the infection with hyperbaric oxygen (also this hyperbaric 02 will speed tissue regeneration.) I never recommend prophylactic antibiotic use but frequent swabs of the burned areas should be done and if bacteria is detected immediate treatment with antibitoic combinations (to prevent resistance) should be initiated.Skin grafts as necessary once the patient stabilizes. Artifical skin can also be used.

Answer:
We're never as smart as we think, and nature is more robust than we imagine. The famous Captain Murphy of the USAF promulgated his law about the rocket program. It's geometric progressions more true in medicine.
Just when the fluid and electrolyte problems seem to be in hand, the patient goes into ARDS or you need to have a Swan-Ganz to keep up, and it causes SBE. Your antibiotics work, but you wind up with Pseudomonas, it requires an aminoglycoside, and the kidneys are shot. There's a PE, or your prophylaxis for the PE causes a massive GI hemorrhage. The old "age+%BSA burn=mortality rate" rule still holds as an empiric guide, and if we do better, it's not through medical advances but devine intervention, though of course we always try our best.
good answer: give ivf for hypovolemic shock, epi for vasodilation, and hyperbaric O2, but this O2 therapy only inhibit the growth of anaerobic organisms like the Clostridia specie, which are responsible for tetanus, pseudomembranous colitis and butolism. the organism which is mostly present in burns are usually aerobes, meaning they thrive well in areas with oxygen. in burns, the pseudomona specie is most responsible for wound infection. these aerobes will then be responsible for sepsis.

a big problem in burned patients is electrolyte imbalance, which though can be corrected with fluids but can lessen survival of victims

but, if a patient will have 98% of his total body surface area (tsba) burned, he still have good chances of survival if he will be under strict medical care. and, percentage in burned patient only measures the tsba. if internal organs are not severely damages, chances for suvival are optimistic.

ps: your linked page does not mention burns
Put epinephrine on the skin would cause vasoconstriction, but that's the opposite of what you want. You'd be shutting off blood supply to anything still living.

Hyperbaric 02 has not proven to be effective at all with patients with burns. In fact, it could be harmful due to delay in other treatments.

Antibiotic use is not warranted unless documented infection.

As for just "SIMPLY" treating the hypovolemia, it's easier said than done.
97% and alive??
The patient was misclassified (miscalculation of the burnt area)
He is dead already..

The medicine and health information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.


More Questions and Answers...
  • Has anyone tried Kevin Trudeau's "cures"?
  • Blood Test to determine sex of baby?
  • When trying to amplify a 700bp gene by PCR, a got a band of 1000bp. My primers are about 60bp each. ?
  • Why is every blood type compatible with O Negative?
  • Do all doctors have to have clinic duty?
  • Can you give plasma with these drugs in your system?
  • What is the importance of water and how does it affect the human body?
  • This may be a stupid question, but i might want an answer...why can't you transplant brains?
  • When I was three I had my appendix out, dr. used sulfer, but I was not allowed to have water (back n 1938) why
  • So i was reading a book and it talked about salvia divinorum and was wondering if its dangerous...?