What do these MRI results tight-fisted?
Signal contained by the pedicles and pars interarticularis is the same on the T1 and T2 weighted sequences next to no bone marrow edema signal. There is no spondylolisthesis and no evidence to suggest spondylolysis.
IMPRESSION: No significant abnormality
What does all this indicate? From the sounds of it, my back is ok and within seems to be no diagnoses however. It is a workers comp and my back hurts basically about every daylight. Could a spinal stress fracture be detected with a regular MRI minus dye? Because before the MRI, thats what my specialist suggested it might be. What are these jargon and what are the T1 and T2? Also has anyone ever hear of workers comp insurance company manipulating medical documents so they arent liable? I have the twinge, but the MRI doesnt give me any proof, any help out please?
Answer:
I agree with the above posters. Additionally:
Spondylolysis mechanism a fracture or break in the bony ring of the vertebra, which surrounds the spinal cord. This can arise due to stress injury and can be a source of distress.
Spondylolisthesis is actual slippage of one vertebral body over another due to spondylolysis, and may cause spinal stenosis and twinge. Spinal stenosis is narrowing of the canal through which the spinal cord pass; this can cause sassiness compression and resulting pain, poor standard, or other symptoms.
The pars interarticularis refers to a particular anatomic portion of the vertebral body. It is the most adjectives site of stress fracture and spondylolysis; I assume the radiologist mentioned it specifically because your doctor indicated he was concerned almost a stress fracture.
Bone marrow edema is an indicator of fracture. If there be a recent fracture or stress fracture, the area should show marrow edema.
T1 and T2 weighted sequences: Too much information! I could explain this, but you would regret it! WWD is correct, it is industrial terminology related to the physics of how the descriptions are acquired. If you hold insomnia, I can go into more detail -- the explanation is a great sleep inducer.
There is certainly no reason to use contrast dye. Contrast is expendable or helpful surrounded by identifying fractures on MRI.
I enjoy never heard of workers comp falsify records and I regard as it's very unlikely. It is much more plausible that you have a valid source of pain explicitly simply not detected by the MRI scan. No study is perfect.
no focal disc abnormality: exactly what it sounds close to
no central or neural foraminal stenosis: no narrowing of the opening through which the spinal cord or the spinal nerves pass
pedicles and pars interarticularis is alike on the T1 and T2 weighted sequences with no bone marrow edema signal: deeply no fluid buildup in or around the bones
spondylolisthesis and no evidence to suggest spondylolysis: no irregular displacement of the vertebrae.
This just routine that the cause of your niggle is not due to a dysfunction of the spinal column and you need to look for another create.
You have no structural abnormality, and it would almost certainly enjoy shown a stress fracture. No, they don't alter legal history; that would be so illegal that the monetary risks would be greater than the potential liability of a moment ago paying the claim, and people could jump to jail. None of this by any medium suggests that the pain isn't authentic, and it's perfectly usual for within to be no objective evidence of what cause back dull pain. As a matter of reality, when there is an abnormality shown, it's recurrently a spurious finding unrelated to the symptoms. You're headed down the everyday path of workmen's comp claims, near an initial denial, appeal, etc.
Oh, and the T1 and T2 weighted images are industrial terms single a physicist or electrical engineer would love, have to do with the spin imparted by the fascinating field on protons.
that's a completely run of the mill mri. that means your anguish cannot be explained by the the scan. an mri would not detect certain soft tissue abnormality such as muscle spasms however, regardless, you almost certainly don't enjoy a stress fracture.