Can doctors prescribe at hand self drug?
Answer:
YES in the U.S. they prescribe for themselves and their family all the time. But, if it is a controlled substance it is extraordinarily much frowned upon and can result in their DEA number person revoked.
But I see many doctors writing themselves/child lone simple meds, such as antibiotics.
No. That is considered a breach of medical ethics and is wrong in most places. They also can't prescribe for their family (though many do).
I prescribe for myself if I know exactly what I have.
If they did, it might not enjoy the same pshcyological effect as someone else prescrbing it. Pluse, it's "their," not "within."
Why not? If they know what's wrong with them, and they're ably educated surrounded by the medical field, I guess they could prescribe prescription to themselves...
NO
definitely not, and it's a polite thing. if they could, they could diagnose themselves beside anything they felt similar to, giving them unlimited access to any number of drugs. they'd be spending a lot smaller quantity time in the bureau and a bunch more time on the street corner peddling their wares...
Sure. There are times when it is stupid to do so, and self-prescribing controlled drugs resembling narcotics is a good agency to get a knock on the door from a regulatory agency, but for abundantly of little stuff, there's no problem.
They are doctors so why can't they prescribe for themselves? Many doctors in certainty do prescription for themselves. But are they really allowed or not?
Generally, self prescription by doctors is discouraged. It is part of the rule in every medical academy. It may be convenient for doctors to self-prescribe, but self-prescribing can be dangerous for different reasons: it lacks the objectivity and professional distance that usually exist between a physician and a merciful, and can lead to a difficulty in diagnosis and surrounded by decision to treat.
The authenticity of self prescription by the doctors depends on legislation of certain places. Some own stipulated rules prohibiting it but some have no definite rules despite the discouragement of doing such.
In UK...The General Medical Council has a reliable rule that prohibits doctors to prescribe for themselves. They are adviced to get a prescription from a professional colleague if they are poorly. The GMC warned that doctors violate the rule can be removed from the register.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/645428...
You may be interested to read this too:
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1g1-16122341...
In Victoria, Australia self prescription by doctors is illegal.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1g1-13813441...
Every doctor get different views on that business.
http://news.africast.com/health_article.
In conclusion, the doctor may but may not be allowed to prescribe for themselves. That would depend the place and on the doctor's personal view. They can prescribe for themselves, that's an natural task they can do but some jurisdiction have set rules not allowing them to do so.
doctor can prescribe for him and also for his family
usually doctors prefer feelings of other doctor for their family
member.
there is no wrong if he writes for other family
dr.dave