I am feed up near the big pharmaceuticals, western drug, and the FDA. What is wrong next to them?
Their basis of belief:
If the customer is sick, we'll treat the symptoms and distribute them on their way. "Thank you, we hope to see you adjectives again"
Big pharma sure loves all that $$$ from manipulation of ailments.
If something non-patentable comes around they achieve angry and denounce it! No!..antioxidants cause cancer! Use our synthetic chemicals your body requests to rid the cancer! *heart attack or stroke may occur*
"Oh my goodness apple cider vinegar, honey, and garlic together make a huge remedy for many things. Zoinks Billy this could hurt us! Let's use JAMA and say-so that these together are toxic and have no effects for one!"
And the FDA..where on earth to begin.
Answer:
Just looked-for to thank WWD for providing the voice of reason. If anyone really doubts the benefits of western medication, just travel to any 3rd world country and ask the locals what it's close to to watch someone die from Malaria or any one of a hundred other illnesses that we've manage to keep contained by check.
And by the way, adjectives those "alternative" medications that are freely sold at GNC and others are also provided by companies that are making ridiculous profits from peoples ailments. And usually near no verifiable benefits.
oh man and do you know they test on beagles? the sweet dogs? i lately read a document. ugh, how can they do that to man's best friend? they test them till they die. BEAGLES!
Its going on for the money man. Their will never be cures for things. Just medicine that will allow you to live next to it so the drug companies can make money.
I do not pilfer any meds. only vitamins. I exercise and devour right. I dont need drug. Im a baller.
It is a concern that the pharmaceutical industry now funds close to two thirds of adjectives research, and their profit margins are unconscionable, but let's not go too far. Whether antioxidants do any angelic is a supposition drawn from the idea that diets rich within them are associated with better health. It's a huge leap of principle to assume that they are indeed responsible for the effect. That is still in research. The same logic holds true near your other "remedies." They may have some marginal benefit contained by selected instances, but there's no evidence of great benefit. If you want to do the studies to prove it, find a grant. I suspect you don't read any medical or pharmaceutical studies, or you'd never try to formulate the parallels you hold. There's a lot of rigorous medical methodology that has to be met for studies to enjoy a remote chance of showing benefit of any proposed treatment. Oh, and JAMA and some of the other peer-reviewed journal go to great length to minimize the influence of corporate money on what they publish. They're not at all close to your average magazine.