Should general public With RLS Symptoms Ever Be Treated for RLS, if they Have no Genetic Predisposition?
Answer:
On the whole, once restless leg syndrome become symptomatic enough, it merits treatment.
Remember, RLS is more than basically an annoyance when you're awake; it can, and does, often disturb sleep sufficiently to induce daytime drowsiness, or impair flair to react to a hastily changing situation--like driving within busy traffic.
Genetic disposition or not, once the disease begins to produce significant interference with accomplishments of daily living, treatment wishes considered. Here, as with adjectives other disease processes, the potential risks must be carefully weigh against the expected benefits, and the risk vs. benefit evaluation merits periodic reassessment.
RLS? Do you propose Restless Leg Syndrome or something else? If so, why not treat?
You're really not making sense.
If someone has RLS, you treat it, whether or not their DNA say they have it or not. It's a clinical diagnosis and does not require knowing the DNA composition.
RLS should be evaluated by near doctor as it may be a side effect to other medications they may be on. For example psycotropic meds can make happen RLS.