Okay I have need of help out! It's a medical press?
Answer:
Identical twins DO NOT own identical fingerprints. They do enjoy identical DNA.
Fingerprints do not depend on your DNA and are developed while you are contained by the womb during the 13th-19th week of growth.
Even twins have different finger prints. No one individual has like peas in a pod finger prints as the other. As far as DNA they have extremely similar DNA so much so that it is not admit in court ( it leaves doubt to whom lacking a doubt commited the crime. You can not say "very well it was one of these two"
The primary answer is NO. Identical -- or monozygotic -- twins form when a single fertilized egg splits in two after conception. Because they form from a single zygote, the two individuals will hold the same genetic makeup. Their DNA is virtually indistinguishable.
Although one and the same twins have like peas in a pod genotype, or DNA, they have different phenotypes, aim that the same DNA is expressed surrounded by different ways.
Traits determined by phenotype, such as fingerprints and physical appearance, are the result of "the interaction of the individual's genes and the developmental environment in the uterus." Thus, a DNA tryout can't determine the difference between identical twins, while a simple fingerprint can.
However, fingerprints are not an entirely genetic all your own. Scientists love to use this topic as an example of the old "character vs. nurture" debate. Fingerprinting, along with other physical characteristics, is an example of a phenotype -- implication that it is determined by the interaction of an indivdual's genes and the developmental environment in the uterus.
The authoritative shape of fingerprints are believed to be influenced by environmental factors during pregnancy, approaching nutrition, blood pressure, position in the womb and the growth rate of the fingers at the completion of the first trimester.
Thus, you will find similar partterns of whorls and ridges within the fingerprints of identical twins. But nearby will also be differences -- just as in that are differences between the fingers on any individual's hands.
Identical twins develop from matching fertilized egg. This is why they have one and the same DNA. Fingerprints develop after the the egg divides into separate embryos. This is why fingerprints are unique to an individual.
Identical twins enjoy identical DNA but not equal fingerprints. They are technically clones, but fingerprints are not determined by genes. It is rather resembling expecting each of them to own achne pimples in exactly like peas in a pod places or develop cavities contained by all matching teeth.
BTW: watch more PBS. ABC_NBC_CBS_USA is forsaken entertainment masquerading as information.
Identical twins result from the splitting of one egg into two embryos. So, they are the result of a singel egg and a single sperm, which means they will own the same DNA.
That is correct. Identical twins enjoy identical DNA. They do not hold identical fingerprints. Fingerprints develope as the child does and probably would be like peas in a pod if the children were exposed to the EXACT same conditions. But even surrounded by a mothers womb, one child may be squished more, not receive as much nourishment, or any of a million other things. Each of which influences the stencil the skin grows into.