Doctors as Judge Refusing Treatment to Women?
be allowed the option of choosing a different doctor.
My cross-question is this, do you think that doctors and other strength care professionals should enjoy a disclosure for patients prior to being treated stating what treatments they are morally against. I individually would not want to pay the dignified prices of a doctors visit of late to be told the type of treatment I want is one he or she would not perform, be it anything.
Answer:
I agree near you.
I believe that patients should have access to any officially recognized procedure or drug, especially in an Emergency Department environment. When it's not a critical emergency, in attendance may be time to have a discussion near the physician and choose another one.
Rather than the disclosure that you seek, I would fairly seek legislative requirements of Emergency Dept. physicians to consider ALL allowed treatments. If the ER Doc thinks he or she have a problem with some of those treatments, the onus should be on him/her to recuse him/herself and find a replacement pronto.
For the narrative, I am anti-abortion and pro-choice. And I choose to keep that a thoroughly private matter and not try to convince or convert anyone from their point of picture to mine...and I expect the same courtesy from everyone else.
I newly read that same article! My sympathy was beside the patient, but it is a tough name to force doctors to prescribe abortion pills. I wish the woman involved could hold gone to a different doctor, one that would have done as she asked. Because she have rights too. The whole situation is such a mess and requirements to be resolved by some emergency room rules.
She should have gone to another doctor.
the morning after pill prevents conception - but the disagreement contained by the abortion social issue is the debate as to where energy begins. Intercourse? Conception? Birth?
Everyone have an opinion.
The doctor have a right to her own convictions. If she is against the morning after pill for any reason consequently she should not be required to prescribe it.
There ARE other doctors and there ARE option for patients in that luggage.
I work in a doctor's department, and all untried patients receive a letter beforehand stating what treatments we do and do not execute, so the patient have the right to choose beforehand whether or not to keep an appointment.
I believe yes, there should be a disclosure.
But frankly, if you are a doctor you should put your petty religious bigotry aside.
How dare he muse he can force a woman to have a child born of rape! It astounds me.
I'm glad he can sleep surrounded by his expensive home at night. Knowing that she is not simply going to have to operate with the trauma of her experirnece. But concordat with the certainty that because he feels differently give or take a few a subject she should have to turn through having a child that be born from rape.
What a quack. He's supposed ot be a doctor not a preacher.
I agree with you. Normally i am against the morning after pill, and i am def against abortion, but within this case, if she be raped then she should own the right to get the pill. She should also hold the right to choose another doctor. No one is to be turned away from medical attention. Its the girls out there that screw adjectives kinds of guys and dont use protection, knowing they can grasp pregnant, who use the pill that make me upset. But if a woman be raped then she should know how to recieve whatever she requirements.
The medicine and health information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.
More Questions and Answers...