Is socialized medication a honest concept or a fruitless model?
Answer:
There are ups and downs to socialized medicine
positive:
manage prices on meds and doctors care
everyone could attain the care they necessitate with out going into debt
preventative healthcare a bit than just emergency diligence (which would lead to well again Americans and could possibly be cheaper in some aspects.
Could contribute bonuses for superior healthcare rather than lift a profit approach (everyone gets compensated the same no issue how bad the care)
Less lawsuit verbal abuse as it would be government controlled and the doctors would be held to complex standards.
Less problems with doctors getting kickback from the drug companies and prescribing unnecessary drugs.
negative:
waiting record for non life threatening surgeries (knee replacement ect..)
difficult taxes
possible stifling of new drugs, research, unmarked procedures
doctors would possibly leave (although I'm not sure where on earth they'd go as most 1st world countries already own socialized medicine)
All in adjectives I would say it would be better for the American nation but possibly worse for the doctors and pharmacutical companies.
hmm wat, stay away from the drugs
The patients. All doctors get rewarded in socialized pills, unlike Medicare that seldom pays at all and can put doctors out of business or cut their staff when the monies do not come within. Socialized medicine have more complications than payments because options are eliminate for choices that patients are extended in non-socialized medicinal strictness. A gall bladder operation may not become available, or a hysterectomy if the surgery is recommended.
The medicine and health information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.
More Questions and Answers...